Summary

Rabies is an important zoonotic disease in India, Rabies occurs in all parts of Indian subcontinent except Andaman, Nicobar and Lakshwadeep group of islands. Fourteen rabies virus isolates were partially sequenced, phylogenetic analysis were performed in relation to the other Indian isolates and other Asian isolate sequences available in the GenBank with two different regions of the "N" gene. Thus it appears that genetic heterogeneity exists between viruses in India although they could not be geographically specifically delineated. Two genetic groups of rabies viruses appear to co-circulate, one in primarily in Tamil Nadu and the other in the other regions of South India. Further studies using a greater number of isolates from several states in India will be required in order to investigate more precisely the molecular epidemiological status of rabies virus circulating in India.

Key words: Rabies virus; Indian isolate, nucleoprotein sequencing, phylogenetic analysis, genetic characterization


Introduction

Rabies is an important zoonotic disease that still poses a serious problem in many developing countries. In spite of pet animal vaccination and several. rabies control measures initiated by government agencies, eradication of rabies in developing countries has been not very successful. Low vaccination coverage in pet dog vaccination and ineffective management of stray dogs are the most likely reasons for the program's lack of success. Human mortality from endemic canine rabies was estimated to be 55,000 deaths per year with 56% of the deaths estimated to occur in Asia. The majority (84%) of these deaths occur in rural areas (WHO Technical Report Series, 931, 2005).

Rabies occurs in all parts of Indian sub-continent except Andaman, Nicobar and Lakshwadeep group of islands. The increasing human population as well as the increase in the stray dog population of the country has resulted in more human-dog contacts. Dogs are responsible for 96% of human rabies cases. The mortality in livestock and pet animals is far higher than the number available due to lack of exact reports (Sehgal, 1997).

Rabies virus belongs to the Lyssavirus genus of the Family Rhabdoviridae. This genus is composed of rabies virus (genotype 1) and rabies-related viruses, including Lagos bat virus (genotype 2), Mokola virus (genotype 3), Duvenhage virus (genotype 4), European bat lyssaviruses 1 and 2 (genotypes 5 and 6 respectively), and Australian bat lyssaviruses (genotype 7 (Gould et 01.,1998 ). The nucleoprotein (N) gene of rabies virus is the most popular target for rabies diagnosis using reverse transcription ­polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) because the gene is highly conserved and can be applied to genetic analysis (Arai etal.,1997, Ito etal., 2001, Kamolvarin et 01., 1993, Sacramento et al., 1991). The N gene, although highly conserved, allows viral strains to be accurately differentiated by analyzing genetic differences that are present within the gene (Johnson, et 01., 2002). Molecular epidemiology of rabies has been performed not only at regional levels but also at the global level (Kissi etal., 1995; Smith etal., 1992). However, there is little information available on the molecular epidemiology of rabies virus in Asia (Nishizono et 01., 2002; Susetya et 01., 2003; Ito et 01., 1999; Park, et al., 2005; David et 01., 2000) Regarding India, we previously reported the characterization of nucleoprotein sequence of an Indian isolate of rabies virus (Jayakumar et al., 2004). In the present study, to determine the dynamics of rabies virus in India in more detail, we used two variable regions of the 'N' gene of rabies virus isolates from Southern part of India.

Materials and Methods

Samples

Fourteen field rabies virus isolates were obtained from 12 dogs, one calf and one goat from Chennai. Tamil Nadu, India. These brain specimens were collected during necropsy from suspected rabies animals done at the Madras Veterinary College Hospital. Chennai during the years 2003-2005.

Primers

Two sets of primers were used, the details of which are shown in Table 1.  

Primer

Sequence (5' - 3')

Position on

PCR

 

 

the N gene

product size

NF 28

GCG GAT CCC ACC TCT

61-80

1380 bp

 

ACA ATG GAT GCC G

 

 

NR32

ITA TGA GTe ACT CGA

 

 

 

ATA TGT CT

1423-1401

 

NFl

GAC ATG TCC GGA

 

 

 

AGA CTG G

319-337

524 bp

NR1

GTA TTG CCT CTC

 

 

 

TAG CGG TG

823-842

 

Fluorescent antibody test

Rabies diagnosis was done by a direct fluorescent antibody test (FAT) using anti-rabies 'N' polyclonal antibody conjugate (Bio-Rad, Australia) on impression smears of hippocampus region of the brain following the procedure of Dean and Abeseth (1973). The FAT positive samples were used for RT-PCR.

RNA extraction

RNA was extracted from the FAT positive brain samples using a commercial reagent TRlzol® (Invitrogen, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions and the extracted RNA was used immediately in RT-PCR reactions.

RT-PCR

CDNA was prepared using 1 mg of total RNA using the THERMOSCRIPT kit (Gibco-BRL, USA) and random hexamers according to the manufacturer's instructions. PCR was performed in MJ Research Thermal Cycler (PTC-200) programmed for 5 cycles with denaturation at 94°e for 2 mins; annealing at 45°e for 1 min, and elongation at 72°e for 2 mins. Subsequently, the annealing temperature was increased to 500e for 5 cycles and at 55°C for 20 cycles. The ultimate elongation was at 72°C for 10mins.

Nucleotide sequencing and phylogenetic analysis

The amplified PCR products were purified using the gel extraction kit (AuPrep, USA) and sequenced using the forward and reverse PCR primers in an ABI Prism 3700 DNA Sequencer (PEApplied Biosystem, USA). The nucleotide sequences thus obtained were aligned to get the partial 'N' gene sequence of isolates and had been deposited in GenBank, the accession numbers of which are presented in Table 2. The other know sequences of rabies viruses from other parts of India and the world, used for comparison and phylogenetic analysis in this study were obtained from the GenBank database and their accession numbers are also presented in the Table 2.

AY259846, AY259853, AY259851, AF334790, AY259841, AY259842, AY259843, AY259844, AY259845, AF374721, AY644760, AY644782, AY644780 and AY644761.

The sequences used for analysis were downloaded and imported into the Alignment explorer of MEGA 3.1 (Kumar et 01., 2004). Two different regions of nucleoprotein gene (nucleotide positions 5' - 45 to 310 and 5' - 311 to 710) were used for the analysis. Multi­sequence alignment was done using Clustal W alogorithm and the file was saved in MEGA format and opened in the MEGA window. Phylogenetic tree was created using the neighbor-joining method with Kimura-2 parameter model was used to create a guide tree. Bootstrap analyses with 1000 replications were done to determine the confidence interval of the developed tree (Kumar et al., 2004).

Genbank

Year

Species

Country

Genbank

Year

Species

Country

AC.No.

 

 

of origin

Ac. No.

 

 

oforigin

AY259846

1997 (C)

Dog

Tamil Nadu. India

AY854581

2000 (C)

Cow

Ardebil, Iran

AY259853

1998 (C)

Dog

Tamil Nadu,lndia

AY854582

2000 (C)

Cow

Masjid Soleiman, Iran

AY259851

1999 (C)

Dog

Tamil Nadu,lndia

AY854583

2000 (C)

Sheep

Shahroud, Iran

flf334790

2001 (C)

Dog

Tamil Nadu,lndia

AY854584

2000 (C)

Dog

Hashlroud, Iran

AY259841

1996 (C)

Goat

Tamil Nadu,lndia

AY854585

2000 (C)

Jackal

Estahban, Iran

AY259842

1996 (C)

Calf

Tamil Nadu, India

AB009663

NK

Vaccine strain

RC-HL, Japan

AY259843

1996 (C)

Dog

Tamil Nadu,lndia

AB044824

NK

Vaccine strain

Nishigahara, Japan

AY259844

1997 (C)

Dog

Tamil Nadu,lndia

flf155039

NK

3AG

Chinese strain

AY259845

1997 (C)

Dog

Tamil Nadu,lndia

flf499686

NK

SRV9- Vaccine strain

China

flf374721

2001 (C)

Dog

Tamil Nadu,lndia

flf367863

NK

CTN

China

AY644760

2003 (C)

Dog

Tamil Nadu,lndia

AY102997

NK

Rv335-vaccine

China

AY644782

2001 (C)

Dog

Tamil Nadu, India

AY102999

2005 (R)

00g-Rv341

China

AY644780

2001 (C)

Dog

Tamil Nadu,lndia

AB010549

2005 (R)

Canis familiaris

China

AY644761

2003 (C)

Dog

Tamil Nadu,lndia

00108986

2005 (R)

Strain CQJqj-1

China

00105944

2005(R)

Dog

Kerala, India,

00108985

2005 (R)

Strain CQJwx-1

China

00105943

2005(R)

Dog

Kerala, India

00108987

2005 (R)

Strain CQJfj-1

China

00105945

2005(R)

goat

Kerala,lndia

00108989

2005 (R)

Strain CO/wl-1

China

00105946

2005(f1)

goat

Kerala, India

00108988

2005 (R)

Strain CQJws-1

China

00105947

2005(R)

Dog

Kerala, India

AY218998

2003 (R)

Oog- dumb rabies

Thailand

00105948

2005(R)

Dog

Kerala, India

AY218997

2003 (R)

Oog- furious rabies

Thailand

00105949

2005(R)

Dog

Kerala, India

AY218999

2003 (R)

Human- dumb rabies

Thailand

00105950

2005(R)

Calf

Kerala, India

AY219000

2003 (R)

Human- furious rabies

Thailand

00105951

2005(R)

Calf

Kerala, India

AB154242

2003 (R)

Tiger

Indonesia

00105952

2005(f1)

Dog

Kerala, India

AB154208

2003 (R)

Cat

Indonesia

00105953

2005(R)

Dog

Kerala, India

A8154243

2003 (R)

Dog

Indonesia

00105954

2005(R)

Goat

Kerala, India

AB154209

2003 (R)

Cat

Indonesia

00105955

2005(R)

Cow

Kerala,lndia

AB15423B

2003 (R)

Dog

Indonesia

00105956

2005(R)

Dog

Karnataka, India

AB154237

2003 (R)

Dog

Indonesia

00105957

2005(R)

Dog

Karnalaka, India

AB041969

1996 (C)

Water buffalo

Sri Lanka

00105958

2005(R)

Cow

Karnataka, India

AY13B549

1986 (C)

Dog

Sri Lanka

00105959

2005(R)

Dog

Andhra Pradesh, India

AB041967

1996 (C)

Mongoose

Sri Lanka

00105960

2005(R)

Dog

Karnalaka, India

AB041965

1996 (C)

Human

Sri Lanka

00105961

2005(R)

Dog

Karnataka India

AB041964

1996 (C)

Jackal

Sri Lanka

00105962

2005(R)

Dog

Karnataka, India

AB04196B

1996(C)

Cal

Sri Lanka

00105963

2005(f1)

Dog

Karnataka, India

AB041966

1996 (C)

Dog

Sri Lanka

00105964

2005(R)

Cow

Kerala, India

AY854586

2000 (C)

Cow

Mashad, Iran

AY956319

2005(R)

Human

Germany- Organ transplant from India

00076130

2004 (C)

Bovine

South Korea

00146162

2005

Human

UK citizen - bitten by dog while in India

AY219002

2003 (R)

Human-furious rabies

Thailand

AY062069

2005

Goat

Pakistan

AB154241

2003 (R)

Dog

Indonesia

00076120

1998 (C)

Dog

South Korea

AB154242

2003 (R)

Tiger

Indonesia

00076119

1998 (C)

Bovine

SOUlll Korea

AB154208

2003 (R)

Cat

Indonesia

00076131

1999 (C)

Bovine

South Korea

AY13B549

1986 (C)

Dog

Sri Lanka

00076127

2002 (C)

Dog

South Korea

AY854596

1986 (C)

Dog

Sri Lanka

00076126

2004 (C)

Racoon-Dog

South Korea

AY138550

2001 (C)

Bovine

Sri Lanka

AY854580

2000 (C)

Goat

Khash,lran

 

 

 

 

 

Result and Discussion

Fourteen rabies antigen positive samples were obtained from 12 dogs, one calf and one goat in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. Phylogenetic analysis of these fourteen isolates sequenced in this study were performed in relation to the other Indian isolates sequenced (Nagaraj an et at., 2005) and other Asian isolate sequences available in the GenBank with two different regions of the 'N' gene.

Using sequences from nucleotide 45-310, three different clades could be identified, one comprising of isolates from Kerala, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh along with others from Pakistan, Korea, Japan and China. Other clade had isolates from China, Thailand and Indonesia. The third clade comprised of isolates from Sri Lanka and Tamil Nadu (Chennai) along with one isolate from Kerala. It is interesting to note that isolates from Southern states of India (Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karanataka and Andra Pradesh) group differently. All the isolates from Tamil Nadu and Sri Lanka are together and different from those in the adjoining Southern States such as Kerala, Karnataka and Andra Pradesh. This could be due to the closer proximity of Southern Tamil Nadu to Sri Lanka. However Kerala has heterogeneity of isolates, one isolate DQ105964 from a cow grouping itself with those from Tamil Nadu. This could have come from a cow transported from Tamil Nadu to Kerala for slaughter. It is a regular practice that Kerala State getting their cattle from Tamil Nadu for their meat consumption through out the year. Most probably this cow may have been transported to Kerala and died due to rabies. However, this cannot be confirmed. While other isolates of Kerala group themselves with those from Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh (Figure 1).

 

 

While sequences from nucleotides 311-700 were not available for isolates from other parts of India, the Tamil Nadu isolates for which they were available again grouped themselves with the Sri Lankan ones, confirming their genetic relationship (Figure 2). The genetic divergence between samples from Sri Lanka and the most closely related Indian samples (Chennai) suggests a similarity distant common ancestor for these two virus populations. Rabies viruses in Sri Lanka and India may be more closely related than described elsewhere (Nanayakkara et 01.,2003, Arai et 01.,2001). However, although considerable genetic diversity was found in the available sequences for rabies virus from the Indian subcontinent only fifteen Indian isolates lineage shared a common ancestry with Sri Lankan samples. It is also interesting to find out that isolates in Iran, a Middle Eastern Country showing lineage with those in Far / South Eastern countries of Japan and Korea. However other South Eastern countries such as Thailand and Indonesia also cluster together.

It is interesting that when the 5'- 45-310 region of nucleoprotein was used to analyze the reported sequences the isolates reported from Chennai and one isolate from Kerala (DQ105964) are related to Sri Lankan isolates. The isolates reported from other parts (Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Goa (UK citizen bitten while in India-DQ146162) and a reported sequence from an organ transplant from India) were closely related to the Korean isolates.

Phylogenetic data suitable for compilation of a large epidemiological study were provided by using a shorter sequence, that of a 200-bp region of the N gene, in a study of 87 isolates collected from areas where dog rabies virus is enzootic in Asia, Africa, Europe and the Americas (Smith et 01., 1992). The analysis supports the earlier report of (Jayakumar et 01., 2004) that an Indian isolate from the state of Tamil Nadu was closely related to Sri Lankan isolates and fall in the Asian cluster. However, the results were analyzed with one isolate from India and the 5' 400 bp region of the N gene was used for analysis.

Thus it appears that genetic heterogeneity exists between viruses in India although they could not be geographically specifically delineated. Two different genetic groups of rabies viruses appear to co-circulate, one primarily in Tamil Nadu and the other in the other regions of South India. It would be interesting to relate these viruses to the clinical signs of the viruses noticed. These two lineages also do not appear to be delineated in terms of species of animal affected. Further studies using a greater number of isolates from several states in India will be required in order to investigate more precisely the molecular epidemiological status of rabies viruses circulating in India. Such a genetic database would be useful for tracing the routes of rabies infection and for establishing measures to eliminate the rabies viruses.

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research,Government of India. We thank Drs. K. Thangaraj and Lalji Singh, CCMB, Hyderabad for their immense help rendered in the sequencing and the analysis.

References

  1. WHO Technical Report series, 931, 2005.

  2. Sehgal S (1997). In Dodet, B., Meslin, EX. (Eds).Rabies Control in Asia. Meslin Elsevier.Paris.pp140-145.

  3. Gould RA" Hyatt AD, Lunt R, Kattenbelt AJ, Hengstberger S. and Blacksell S D (1998).Characterization of a novellyssavirus isolated from Pteropid bats in Australia. Virus Res.54,165-187.

  4. Arai YT, Yamada K, Kameoka Y, Horimoto T, Yamamoto K, Yabe S, Nakayama M, and Tashiro M (1997). Nucleoprotein gene analysis of fixed and street rabies virus variants using RT-PCR.Arch. Virol. 142, 1787-1796;

  5.  Ito M, Arai YT, Sakai T, Ito FH , Takasaki T, and Kurane I (2001). Genetic characterization and geographic distribution of rabies virus isolates in Brazil:identification of two reservoirs, dogs and vampire bats Virology 248,214-222.  

  6. Kamolvarin N, Tirawatnpong T, Rattanasiwamoke R, Tirawatnpong S, Panpanich T and Hemachudha T (1993). Diagnosis of rabies by polymerase chain reaction with nested primers. J.infect.Dis.167:,07­210.  

  7. Sacramento 0, Bourhy Hand Tordo N (1991). PCR technique as an alternative method for diagnosis and molecular epidemiology of rabies virus. Mol.Cell.Probes. 5, 229-240.

  8. Johnson N, McElhinney LM, Smith J, Lowings P, Fooks AR (2002) . Phylogenetic comparison of the genus Lyssavirus using distal coding sequence of the glycoprotein and nucleoprotein gene. ArchVioI.147,2111-2123)  

  9. Kissi B , Bourhy Hand lordo N (1995).Genetic polymorphism in the rabies virus nucxleoprtein gene. Virology 209, 526-537.

  10. Smith J.S, Orciar, LA, Yager PA" Seidel. HD and Warner CK (1992). Epidemiologic and historical relationships among 87 isolates as determined by limited sequence analysis. J.!nfect.Dis.166,296­307 ..

  11. Jayakumar R, Tirumurugan KG, Ganga G, Kumanan K and Mahalinga Nainar A (.2004). Characterization of nucleoprotein gene sequence of an Indian isolate of rabies virus. Acta.ViroI.48,47-

  12. Dean OJ and Abelseth MK (1973). The fluorescent antibody test. IN: Kaplal{ MM and Koprowsk E (eds), Laboratory Techniques in Rabies, 3 edition. WHO,Geneva, pp.73-84.

  13. Nanayakkara S, Smith, JS and Rupprecht C E (2003) Rabies in Sri Lanka: Splendid Isolation. Emerging Infectious Diseases 9, 368­371.

  14. Arai YT, Takahasi H , Kameokat Y, Shiino T, Wimalaratne 0, Lodmell DL.(2001) Characterization of Sri Lanka rabies virus isolates using nucleotide sequence analysis of nucleoprotein gene. ActaVirol. 45, 327-333.

  15. Nishizon A, Mannen K, .Elio-Villa,L P, Tanaka S, Li K S, Mifune K, .Arca B F, Canban A, Martinez B, Rodriguez A. Atienza VC, Camba R ,and Resontoc N.(2002). Genetic Analysis of Rabies Virus Isolates in Philippines .. Microbiol.ImmunoI.46,413­417.  

  16. Susetya H, Sugiyama M, Inagaki A, Ito N, Oraveerakul K, Traiwanatham Nand Minamoto N. (2003) .Genetic Characterization of Rabies Field Isolates from Thailand Microbiol. ImmunoI.47,653-659 .  

  17. Ito N, Sugiyama M, Oraveerakul K, Piyaviriyakul P, Lumlertdacha B, Arai YT, Tamura Y, Mori Y and Minamoto N (1999) Molecular Epidemiology of rabies in Thailand. Microbiol.lmmunoI.43,551­559.

  18. Park Y J, Shin M K, and 0 Kwon H M (2005). Genetic Characterization of Rabies virus isolates in Korea. Virus Genes.30, 341-347

  19. David 0 , Yakobson B ,Smith J S and Stram Y(2000). Molecular Epidemiology of rabies virus isolates from Israel and other Middle and Near -Eastern countries. J.CIin.MicrobioI.38,755-762.  

  20. Kumar S, Tamura K , and Nei M (2004) MEGA3: Integrated software for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequence alignment. Briefings in Bioinformatics 5,150-163.).